Roger Scruton, who passed away on Sunday 12th January, was a remarkable philosopher, and one of Britain's leading intellectuals. An often controversial figure - always a healthy sign - he wrote with great integrity, and a love of wisdom. He would often lament the fact that our time has lost a sense of Beauty, and he would articulate this brilliantly, and hold up Beauty as an essential part of what it is to be human. He had, as the obituary says below, published in the magazine The Spectator, immense culture, including a love of music. He was also an accomplished pianist, and farmer.
"Sir Roger Scruton has died. Diagnosed with cancer last summer, he passed away peacefully on Sunday surrounded by his family.
"Sir Roger Scruton has died. Diagnosed with cancer last summer, he passed away peacefully on Sunday surrounded by his family.
There will be a lot of things written and said in the coming days. But perhaps I could say a few things here.
The first is to reiterate something that the Scruton family have said
in their announcement of his death. There they refer to how proud they
are of Roger and of all his achievements. I think I can say that all
Roger’s friends share that feeling. His achievements were remarkable. He
was a man who appeared to know about absolutely everything, producing
books on architecture, philosophy, beauty, music, religion and much
more. In many ways – as his former student Rabbi Sacks once said to me –
he seemed bigger than the age. There appeared to be no area he had not
mastered. In the mid-2000s we were at a dinner party at the house of our
late friend Shusha Guppy with a group of eminent writers and
journalists, all with egos of their own. I remember one of them asking
Roger whether he would think about doing an updated version of his book
‘The West and the Rest’. With characteristic and by no means feigned
humility he replied that he didn’t think so because he didn’t think his
Farsi was any longer up to it. How beautiful it was to see every other
writer in the room look as though they might just give up there and
then.
Doubtless there will be some talk in the coming days of
‘controversy’. Some score-settling may even go on. So it is worth
stressing that on the big questions of his time Roger Scruton was right.
During the Cold War, he faced an academic and cultural establishment
that was either neutral or actively anti-Western on the big question of
the day. Roger not only thought right but acted right. Not many
philosophers become men of action. But with the ‘underground university’
that he and others set up, he did just that. During the 1970s and
1980s, at considerable risk to himself, he would go behind the Iron
Curtain and teach philosophy to groups of knowledge-starved students. If
Roger and his colleagues had been largely leftist thinkers infiltrating
far-right regimes to teach Plato and Aristotle there would have been
multiple Hollywood movies about them by now. But none of that mattered.
Public notice didn’t matter. All that mattered was to do the right thing
and to keep the flame of philosophical truth burning in societies where
officialdom was busily trying to snuff it out.
Having received numerous awards and accolades abroad, in 2016 he was
finally given the recognition he deserved at home with the award of a
Knighthood. Yet still there remained a sense that he was undervalued in
his own country. It was a sense that you couldn’t help but get when you
travelled abroad. I lost count of the number of countries where I might
in passing mention the dire state of thought and politics in my country
only to hear the response, ‘but you have Roger Scruton’. As though that
alone ought to be enough to right the tiller of any society. And in a
way they were right of course. But the point did always highlight the
strange disconnect between his reputation at home and abroad. Britain
has never been very good with philosophers of course, a fact that Roger
thought partly correct, but his own country’s treatment of him was often
outrageous. As the events of the last year reiterated, he might be
invited onto a television or radio programme or invited to a print
interview only for the interviewer to play the game of ‘expose the
right-wing monster’. The last interview he did on the Today Programme
was exactly such a moment. The BBC might have asked him about anything.
They might have asked him about Immanuel Kant, or Hegel, or the correct
attitude in which to approach questions of our day like the environment.
But they didn’t. They wanted cheap gotchas. That is the shame of this
country’s media and intellectual culture, not his.
But if there was a reason why such attempts at ‘gotchas’ consistently
failed, it was because nobody could reveal a person that did not exist.
Of course Roger could on occasion flash his ideological teeth, but he
was also one of the kindest, most encouraging, thoughtful, and generous
people you could ever have known. From the moment that we first met – as
I was just starting out in my career – he was a constant guide as well
as friend. And not just in the big things, but in the small things that
often matter more when you’re setting out. Over the years I lost count
of the number of people who I discovered that he had helped in a similar
way without wanting anyone to notice and expecting no reward for
himself.
A man other than Roger might have become bitter about some of the
treatment he received, but he never did. Whatever his complex views on
faith, he lived a truly Christian attitude of forgiveness and hope for
redemption. His last piece for The Spectator – a diary of his last year
– radiates this. If he sometimes fitted uncomfortably with the age in
which he found himself, it was principally because he did not believe in
its guiding tone of encouraged animosity and professionalised grudge.
He believed instead – and lived in – the spirit of a different age. One
in which he encouraged his readers to share. That is a spirit of
gratitude for what you have received, and forgiveness for what you have
not.
One of my first grieving thoughts on hearing the news was how much I
still had to ask him. But in that spirit which he encouraged I will
instead turn to the shelves I have full of his books and marvel again at
the huge amount he gave us."
Douglas Murray, The Spectator, January 2020
No comments:
Post a Comment